This other Karl posts this chart of debt vs. GDP. It appears our Commie in Chief was slightly incorrect about government spending's impact on the economy. Instead of a positive influence, increasing debt appears to damage an economy. Huh.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39747/3974772b9a21b6daa4faa5b845776f462011859c" alt=""
In other words, don't try this at home.
Karl has some other charts in that post in response to the Fed's stupid 2% inflation concept. Ready for $8 gas?
Karl has some other charts in that post in response to the Fed's stupid 2% inflation concept. Ready for $8 gas?
But there are still about 40% of Americans who support this President and his policies. They are the ones who will tell us there are positives too.
Here's one: look at how our president has influenced the purchase of Silver American Eagle 1oz coins. Source: Seeking Alpha.
Here's one: look at how our president has influenced the purchase of Silver American Eagle 1oz coins. Source: Seeking Alpha.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ca25/2ca25f064b5cd74a6f544bff87e07befaa3e2c12" alt=""
We wonder what a chart of gun sales would look like.
Yes, our Dear Leader has positively influenced several areas of the economy. No argument from us.
Posted today at Dilbert:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c0dd/5c0dd99c40b9a2e25f56598387120b05e76524ce" alt=""
Is it possible the damage to our economy was planned, and the continued assault is intentional?
U/T: Karl
U/T: Karl
1 comment:
Is it possible the damage to our economy was planned, and the continued assault is intentional?
Yes, a socialist government requires dependence on government.
Post a Comment