Prediction #1: Obama will continue to destroy this country.
Prediction #2: Karl will celebrate the end of anther "summer of recovery" this coming Friday or Saturday.
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Bracken Excerpt
Author Matt Bracken just published a short story at his Facebook page: Alas, Brave New Babylon. It is a story of society collapse and survival.
Here is an excerpt that caught our eye:
We've read all of his books. He is an excellent writer. We've found him to be one of the best at understanding human nature, and the evils of big government and diluting values.
Bracken's Amazon Profile.
Here is an excerpt that caught our eye:
It must be the history teacher in me who always seeks historical precedents and comparisons. The former USSR, with the full power of a mass-murdering totalitarian state behind it, attempted for seventy-five years to create a new society of atheist but socially altruistic New Soviet Men—and failed utterly to achieve it. The Soviets considered this a goal worth slaughtering tens of millions of their countrymen, and they still couldn’t achieve it. Not even across four generations and with an entire archipelago of Gulag slave labor camps.
But not even the mass-murdering Soviet rulers were foolish enough to attempt to outlaw sexual differences and mandate a New Genderless Person in the name of perfect political correctness. What sane person in the United States could possibly have thought that our own vastly more ambitious experiment in social re-engineering would turn out any better than the simpler economic revolution attempted by the USSR?
We've read all of his books. He is an excellent writer. We've found him to be one of the best at understanding human nature, and the evils of big government and diluting values.
Bracken's Amazon Profile.
Friday, September 06, 2013
Thursday, September 05, 2013
Grand Slam Photoshops
From All The Right Snark today!
We think all of the creators are Commie Obama hat owners.
As it should be.
The For War image was selected by American Thinker! Way to go!
We think all of the creators are Commie Obama hat owners.
As it should be.
The For War image was selected by American Thinker! Way to go!
Wednesday, September 04, 2013
Red Line Talk
Comrades,
We've gone hoarse the past few days as we've been screaming at the media elites and their misleading statements about Obama's "Red Line."
Everyone that we've heard discuss this starts their timeline with "Obama's Red Line."
In fact, the timeline starts before Obama's "Red Line" statement.
The timeline starts with Assad threatening to use chemical weapons if the rebels gain momentum against regime forces. The "Red Line" was. in. response. to. Assad's. threat.
So, when you hear Rush or others talk about the Al Qaeda rebels using Sarin gas in order to frame Assad, remember these key points:
1) Assad threatened the use of chemical weapons a year ago, which prompted Obama's "Red Line" comment. A comment that has exposed Obama as an irresponsible and incompetent ruler these past few weeks.
2) Sarin gas is very difficult to handle, store and transport. A government with a chemical weapons program is far more likely to use the weapon properly, as it was.
Was it Assad? We don't know.
Could the Al Qaeda rebels have gassed their own people - of course. Dancing in blood is dancing in blood to those people.
Could our media - both old and new - take responsibility for their statements? Could they report the full timeline? Apparently, both old and new are pushing agendas.
Just because we do not trust our president. Just because we've come to learn that his view of America is far different than our founders' and our greatest presidents'. Just because his is a pursuit of reparations and redistribution. Just because we've discovered he is a liar - doesn't mean everything he says is a lie.
The time is long past for the response we wanted. Assad and his leaders should be dust, regardless if they used the WMD. The message should have been sent that anyone who is suspected of using weapons of mass destruction will be thumped by chest-pounding neo-cons.
It is the only real deterrent.
As to the theory that Assad is innocent. Shouldn't we have seen him rushing to the cameras and to the UN immediately after the chemical attack? Why are the people who first consider Assad's innocence Alex Jones and Rush Limbaugh?
We're off to get some tea and honey.
We've gone hoarse the past few days as we've been screaming at the media elites and their misleading statements about Obama's "Red Line."
Everyone that we've heard discuss this starts their timeline with "Obama's Red Line."
In fact, the timeline starts before Obama's "Red Line" statement.
The timeline starts with Assad threatening to use chemical weapons if the rebels gain momentum against regime forces. The "Red Line" was. in. response. to. Assad's. threat.
So, when you hear Rush or others talk about the Al Qaeda rebels using Sarin gas in order to frame Assad, remember these key points:
1) Assad threatened the use of chemical weapons a year ago, which prompted Obama's "Red Line" comment. A comment that has exposed Obama as an irresponsible and incompetent ruler these past few weeks.
2) Sarin gas is very difficult to handle, store and transport. A government with a chemical weapons program is far more likely to use the weapon properly, as it was.
Was it Assad? We don't know.
Could the Al Qaeda rebels have gassed their own people - of course. Dancing in blood is dancing in blood to those people.
Could our media - both old and new - take responsibility for their statements? Could they report the full timeline? Apparently, both old and new are pushing agendas.
Just because we do not trust our president. Just because we've come to learn that his view of America is far different than our founders' and our greatest presidents'. Just because his is a pursuit of reparations and redistribution. Just because we've discovered he is a liar - doesn't mean everything he says is a lie.
The time is long past for the response we wanted. Assad and his leaders should be dust, regardless if they used the WMD. The message should have been sent that anyone who is suspected of using weapons of mass destruction will be thumped by chest-pounding neo-cons.
It is the only real deterrent.
As to the theory that Assad is innocent. Shouldn't we have seen him rushing to the cameras and to the UN immediately after the chemical attack? Why are the people who first consider Assad's innocence Alex Jones and Rush Limbaugh?
We're off to get some tea and honey.
Tuesday, September 03, 2013
If Only It Were The Klingons
Robert Stacy McCain's recent "Funniest Thing on the Internet."
We haven't hit bottom yet. Maybe next year?
We haven't hit bottom yet. Maybe next year?
Gangbangers Hardest Hit
With mockery and sarcasm rivaling our Commie Obama hat, YouTuber CrucibleArms explains the impact of Obama's latest gun-control executive orders:
In case you are confused, one of the executive orders is to ban the re-importation of US firearms that were sold to foreign buyers. This includes the beautiful M1 Garand in the video above.
These rifles are in demand by collectors (non-criminals) and are priced high as a result. They are fun to shoot, but don't fit the low-cost light-weight high-capacity spray-n-pray type weapons desired by the criminal element.
In other words, thatLiberal Progressive Communist in the white house saved zero lives with this executive order.
If you want to know the real reason for the latest gun-control, look at who it hurts, not at who they claim it helps.
U/T: SayUncle
In case you are confused, one of the executive orders is to ban the re-importation of US firearms that were sold to foreign buyers. This includes the beautiful M1 Garand in the video above.
These rifles are in demand by collectors (non-criminals) and are priced high as a result. They are fun to shoot, but don't fit the low-cost light-weight high-capacity spray-n-pray type weapons desired by the criminal element.
In other words, that
If you want to know the real reason for the latest gun-control, look at who it hurts, not at who they claim it helps.
U/T: SayUncle
Syria II
Our first Syria post is getting a big bloated, so we'll start a new one here.
Besides, the story has taken a turn since our last post. Our dear leader has blinked. He is now wondering if 1500 gassed Syrians is worthy of a US response. He is punting to Congress with the hope that they can get him out of this corner he's painted himself into.
First, an observation from Rawdog. Did our dear leader mis-speak, again? Or has Rawdog discovered something that the entire media establishment missed?
We received a hat tip from Diann over at All The Right Snark for suggesting this photo:
She also posted this one on FB:
First,
no soldier wants to go to war. Any war. This is the reason why it is
best to elect a president with a military background. Ah, live and learn.
Second, our military is the last useful government organization, period. It is filled with incredible men and women who risk everything, and who have always answered the call of duty.
Now that call is being answered with this social media protest, albeit by only a few. A sign that our military is going the way of the USPS, NSA, IRS, and DMV?
We don't want one American on the ground anywhere near Syria. Well, ok, maybe Barney Frank could go over there and spread the message of tolerance...
Boots on the ground is not the proper response to the use of chemical weapons. The proper American response, which is weeks late in our opinion, can be done without risking the life of one American.
If the NSA can read these words as I type them, the DOD can pinpoint the location of Assad, his family, and key Syrian infrastructure.
We see these photos of service men are a symptom of our social media culture, the "me" culture.
When we were in the military and wondered what our opinion was on a certain subject, there was always someone close by to help us. In fact, that help would often pre-empt our own thoughts.
The positive of using social media is the potential for an issue to go viral. And pointing out that any damage to the Assad regime in Syria is, in effect, a favor to Al Qaeda has triggered such a viral effect. Of course, there is no rule that says we can't thump Al Qaeda next. We have enough bombs to go around, right?
Maybe such a protest is the only way to get the message out. We all agree we won't hear a contrary view from our media.
Our men in uniform didn't take photos of themselves protesting the coming war in the Pacific in 1942, or in Europe in 1944. And while Forrest Gump and the liberal left would want you to think otherwise, there are only a few photos of military men in uniform protesting the Vietnam war 20 years later.
UPDATED 10:20am:
We found two excellent posts related to ours: Doug Ross and MoonBattery, who comments:
UPDATED 9.9 Noon:
Now that's funny!
Besides, the story has taken a turn since our last post. Our dear leader has blinked. He is now wondering if 1500 gassed Syrians is worthy of a US response. He is punting to Congress with the hope that they can get him out of this corner he's painted himself into.
First, an observation from Rawdog. Did our dear leader mis-speak, again? Or has Rawdog discovered something that the entire media establishment missed?
We received a hat tip from Diann over at All The Right Snark for suggesting this photo:
She also posted this one on FB:
We're not sure about these following pictures of active duty military protesting possible deployment in a Syrian theater of war. Call us undecided, as we seem to be on both sides of the fence at the moment.
Second, our military is the last useful government organization, period. It is filled with incredible men and women who risk everything, and who have always answered the call of duty.
Now that call is being answered with this social media protest, albeit by only a few. A sign that our military is going the way of the USPS, NSA, IRS, and DMV?
We don't want one American on the ground anywhere near Syria. Well, ok, maybe Barney Frank could go over there and spread the message of tolerance...
Boots on the ground is not the proper response to the use of chemical weapons. The proper American response, which is weeks late in our opinion, can be done without risking the life of one American.
If the NSA can read these words as I type them, the DOD can pinpoint the location of Assad, his family, and key Syrian infrastructure.
We see these photos of service men are a symptom of our social media culture, the "me" culture.
When we were in the military and wondered what our opinion was on a certain subject, there was always someone close by to help us. In fact, that help would often pre-empt our own thoughts.
The positive of using social media is the potential for an issue to go viral. And pointing out that any damage to the Assad regime in Syria is, in effect, a favor to Al Qaeda has triggered such a viral effect. Of course, there is no rule that says we can't thump Al Qaeda next. We have enough bombs to go around, right?
Maybe such a protest is the only way to get the message out. We all agree we won't hear a contrary view from our media.
Our men in uniform didn't take photos of themselves protesting the coming war in the Pacific in 1942, or in Europe in 1944. And while Forrest Gump and the liberal left would want you to think otherwise, there are only a few photos of military men in uniform protesting the Vietnam war 20 years later.
UPDATED 10:20am:
We found two excellent posts related to ours: Doug Ross and MoonBattery, who comments:
It will take a while to purge the military of patriots and turn it into a cross between a make-work jobs program and a San Francisco bathhouse. In the meantime, Obama should watch how fast he pushes his anti-American agenda.
UPDATED 9.9 Noon:
Now that's funny!













